Recognizing that intellectual property (IP) assets are crucial tools for driving innovation and promoting growth of the global economy and involve legal complexities, numerous countries have either implemented or are contemplating the establishment of specialized courts. For example, most of the European Union (EU) member states have introduced either a specialized IP court or specialized IP divisions within the general courts, including many in Central and Eastern European countries like Croatia, Czech Republic, Hungary, Lithuania, and Poland. Some non-EU Eastern European countries, including Azerbaijan and Belarus, have also introduced specialized IP courts or divisions. 1 Furthermore, since April 1, 2023, the Unified Patent Court has been in existence. This specialized court is designed to harmonize patent law across the EU, representing the first supranational jurisdiction in Europe for civil law matters. 2 Likewise, Canada, Japan, Thailand, and many other countries have adopted a similar approach to specialization.

The battle against piracy is a persistent challenge in our society, and the unauthorized reproduction of products, misuse of intellectual property, and violation of copyright of intellectual works pose serious problems for the country. Annually, piracy and smuggling cause an estimated economic loss of R$160 billion for Brazil. Given this scenario, it is imperative to adopt effective measures to combat piracy to mitigate the harmful consequences of this practice.

Since 2017, there has been an off-field football dispute over the patent infringement of the spray used to mark the distance between the barrier's position and the ball for free kicks in football matches (see Off-field football dispute: Brazilian spray patent battle, Turnaround in off-field football dispute: Brazilian spray patent battle, and A New Chapter on Football Spray - an off-field dispute - the Brazilian spray patent battle with FIFA ).

Esses crimes acarretam prejuízos para todos os envolvidos: o consumidor – exposto a produtos de qualidade questionável – a indústria, os comerciantes e importadores e os governos.

A importância da proteção e registro de nomes, alerta advogada.

On March 19, 2024, the Brazilian PTO published Ordinance n° 10, which establishes new Guidelines for Appeals and Administrative Nullity Requests. Said Guidelines contain Transitional Dispositions that clarify the applicability of the new rules regarding amendments to the set of claims during the 2nd instance for patent applications in which appeals have already been filed.

Destaques no cenário judicial de Propriedade Intelectual durante 2023 no Brasil.

O recente caso das marcas do jogador Mbappé mostra que além de formalidade legal, procedimento ajuda na proteção de imagem.

Pesquisa revela que metade dos advogados do país são mulheres.

Relatório do CNJ conclui que não é possível estabelecer uma tendência de crescimento.